Yes, I know. Originally I was in the, "What is Starbucks thinkin'?!?" camp.
Starbucks and instant coffee just didn't seem to jive for me. Starbucks was about an experience & I had stuck Via in the same camp as the nasty coffee one finds in hotel rooms.
But this past summer my family and I went on a summer break in the middle of nowhere. No Starbucks. No cute coffee shops. Just a cabin, a boat & a lake. We were too lazy to make coffee, [hence the "vacation" part] so we snagged a few Via packs on the way.
Wow. It's actually really good... And insanely easy.
I decided to continue my President of the Lazy Club activities at home & have been hooked ever since. [Seriously, how hard is it to microwave water and stir] I also love the packaging--intentionally designed to take with you so a fresh cup is always on hand.
At this point I realized, they hadn't extended their brand into instant coffee. The extended a lifestyle habit to be more travel-friendly.
Quick lessons I learned:
- Don't be too quick to judge
- When extending your brand, it's possible to stay true to the value proposition even if the product/channel/service is quite different
- Wait until the initial dust settles before trying to convince others of the new idea
What do you guys think? Have you seen this idea played out in other organizations? Yours?
Great post; a lot to think about. I think your initial judgment represents a lot of people, the rest of whom may be less open-minded. It seems like Starbucks missed a marketing opportunity to walk the audience through your exact discovery- "extending a lifestyle habit to be more travel-friendly". Even a different name, like "Pocket Barista" could have conveyed that idea. I think a new & different product can be enveloped by an excited fan base if a company translates the "fan reasoning".
Posted by: Dana Twichell | November 03, 2009 at 12:28 PM